Register Now

Evaluation Process

Judging Criteria & Process

Learn how submissions are evaluated across the Exemplar Track and Developing Track by our expert panel of judges.
View Prizes
Timeline

Fair, Rigorous, Expert-Led

Every submission is reviewed by a panel of experts in nutrition science, medical education, nursing education, and curriculum design. Our structured evaluation process ensures consistent, thorough assessment across both tracks.

Evaluation Process

A structured four-step process from screening through winner selection.

1

Eligibility Screening

Submissions screened for eligibility and completeness. Incomplete entries will not advance.

2

Expert Review

Each submission reviewed independently by multiple evaluators who score against published criteria.

3

Consensus Scoring

Judges convene to discuss scores and reach consensus on final rankings.

4

Winner Selection

Winners selected based on consensus scores. The Award Approving Official verifies compliance before announcement.

Dual-Track Evaluation

Submissions are assessed using criteria tailored to the goals and expectations of each track.

  • Exemplar Track — Evaluated on demonstrated outcomes, evidence of student learning, scalability, and model potential
  • Developing Track — Evaluated on innovation, feasibility, evidence base, and plan for implementation and scaling

What Judges Look For

Each track has specific evaluation criteria aligned with the NIH Nutrition Competency Framework.

Exemplar Track

Existing, implemented programs

  • Demonstrated impact on student knowledge and clinical practice
  • Quality and rigor of existing curriculum materials
  • Evidence of successful implementation and student outcomes
  • Scalability and adaptability to other institutions
  • Alignment with NIH nutrition education priorities

Developing Track

Planned or early-stage programs

  • Innovation and creativity of the proposed approach
  • Feasibility of the implementation plan
  • Strength of the evidence base and pedagogical framework
  • Potential for scaling and dissemination
  • Alignment with NIH nutrition education priorities

Scoring Criteria

Exemplar Track — 45 Points Total

9 criteria, each scored 0-5 points:

  1. Framework — Alignment with HHS Medical Education Nutrition Competency Framework
  2. Innovation — New ideas or approaches in medical nutrition education
  3. Clarity of Teaching Methods — Instructional strategies clearly described
  4. Means to Address Identified Competency Gaps — Topics beyond recommended competencies
  5. Evaluation Methods — Methods for assessing student/trainee outcomes
  6. Evidence of Program Effectiveness — Evaluation data demonstrating effectiveness
  7. Integration of Innovative Approaches — Teaching kitchens, simulation, technology, etc.
  8. Context within Medical Education — Relation to broader curriculum
  9. Interdisciplinary Approach — Collaboration across disciplines

Developing Track — 40 Points Total

8 criteria, each scored 0-5 points (same as Exemplar Track except no Evidence of Program Effectiveness):

  1. Framework — Alignment with HHS Medical Education Nutrition Competency Framework
  2. Innovation — New ideas or approaches in medical nutrition education
  3. Clarity of Teaching Methods — Instructional strategies clearly described
  4. Means to Address Identified Competency Gaps — Topics beyond recommended competencies
  5. Evaluation Methods — Methods for assessing student/trainee outcomes
  6. Integration of Innovative Approaches — Teaching kitchens, simulation, technology, etc.
  7. Context within Medical Education — Relation to broader curriculum
  8. Interdisciplinary Approach — Collaboration across disciplines

Visit the FAQ for answers to common questions, or contact us for more information.

Evaluation Guide

Ready to Transform Nutrition Education?

Learn how to enter the challenge and submit your nutrition curriculum.
Get Started